Contact the
TAOS Lawyer
in Your State Today

Posts Tagged ‘Auto Crash Litigation Conference’

TAOS trial attorneys to present cutting-edge national legal seminar: Auto Crash Litigation 3.1

Learn to increase your car accident settlements during 360 Advocacy conference, April 3-4, 2016 at the Encore Hotel in Las Vegas

Auto Crash Litigation 3.1, image

We’re excited to announce that several of our TAOS trial attorneys will be presenting at the upcoming Auto Crash Litigation 3.1 seminar, sponsored by 360 Advocacy. The conference will be April 3-4, 2016 at the Encore Hotel in Las Vegas. It’s a cutting-edge, advanced legal seminar for experienced auto accident attorneys, and it continues to get larger each year.

For more information about Auto Crash Litigation 3.1 and to register for the seminar, click here.

Here’s a quick preview of our attorneys’ presentation topics:

Steven Gursten: This will be Steve’s third year serving as moderator and speaker. His topic is, “Settlement and Negotiation Strategies in Auto Cases.”

Gary Gober: Gary will cover “10 Lessons from a Lifetime Trying Auto Accident Cases.”

Karen Koehler: Karen will discuss “Voir Dire Questions You Must Ask in Auto Crash Cases.”

Robert Potroff: Bob will present on “The New Pain and Suffering Argument Models that Resonate with Today’s Juries.”

Eric Romano: Eric is speaking on “Advanced Defendant Depositions – Getting Beyond the Basics to Get to the Good Stuff.”

Lance Sears: Lance’s presentation is called, “Putting It All together: What Rules, Reptiles, Damages and OBJ Can Teach Us.”

A little more about the conference: Auto Crash Litigation 3.1 is about learning from the best injury lawyers in the business, with the goal of taking your auto accident practice to the next level. The faculty will show attendees how the correct case preparation, discovery, settlement, mediation and trial knowledge can increase the value car accident lawsuits. Attendees will also learn:

  • How to take on the defenses that insurance defense attorneys and claims adjusters raise.
  • How to find hidden layers of insurance.
  • How to prove economic losses to increase your verdicts and damage.
  • And other ideas that will assure you’re getting the most for your injured clients.

360 Advocacy is a group that hosts legal conferences and seminars for injury plaintiff lawyers. The group was formed in response to the pressures and tactics of the insurance industry.

We at the TAOS Trial Lawyers hope to see you there.

Contact a Taos Lawyer
Find one of the most highly-regarded injury lawyers in your state.
Pages
Need to find something?
Categories
Recent Blog Posts
Find an Attorney In Your Area

Disclaimer: This information is for general informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as legal advice without consulting with a licensed attorney. This is not intended to substitute for the advice of an attorney. Some of the information on this site may be deemed ATTORNEY ADVERTISING in some states. No attorney-client relationship is formed, nor should any such relationship be implied. Past results are no guarantee of future results. By submitting a form, I am giving my permission and consent to be contacted about my possible case. The law is subject to frequent changes and varies from one jurisdiction to another. I give my permission and consent to have an attorney knowledgeable about the law in this state and jurisdiction to contact me about my possible case. Attorney Steven M. Gursten of Michigan Auto Law – Auto Accident Attorneys is responsible for the content of legal advertisements. His office address is 30101 Northwestern Highway, Farmington Hills, MI 48334, and his telephone number is (800) 968-1001.

Missouri: The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based on advertisements alone. Mississippi: FREE BACKGROUND INFORMATION AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.
Iowa: The filing of a claim or suit solely to coerce a settlement or to harass another could be illegal and could render the person so filing liable for malicious prosecution or abuse of process.
New York: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Virginia: Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case and that case results do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case undertaken by the lawyer.